Selected data models

You must log in to select data models for download or further analysis.

13 Search results.
Relevance Rating New first Old first

Pain Disability Index - deutsche Fassung - PDI

- 12/28/21 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 7 items, 1 language
Itemgroup: Beeinträchtigung verschiedener Lebens durch Schmerzen
https://www.testarchiv.eu/de/test/9003694 Der PDI kann bei Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzproblemen eingesetzt werden, um das subjektive Ausmaß an Beeinträchtigung durch die Schmerzproblematik im Alltag zu ermitteln. Er basiert auf einem multidimensionalen Konzept von schmerzbedingter Behinderung und greift dabei auf eine von der WHO (1980) vorgenommene Unterscheidung von Krankheits- und Verletzungsfolgen zurück, in der zwischen Schädigung, Behinderung und Benachteiligung differenziert wird. Erfasst werden sieben Lebensbereiche: (1) Familiäre und häusliche Verpflichtungen, (2) Erholung, (3) Soziale Aktivitäten, (4) Beruf, (5) Sexualleben, (6) Selbstversorgung und (7) Lebensnotwendige Tätigkeiten. Reliabilität: Cronbachs Alpha lag bei Alpha = .83-.90. Validität: Die Eindimensionalität des PDI wurde bestätigt. Die Konstruktvalidität wird durch moderate bis hohe Korrelationen mit den folgenden Indikatoren für die erlebte Behinderung belegt: (1) Down-Time: r = .40; (2) selbstentwickelte funktionale Einschätzungsskala zu Erfassung konkreter Verhaltensbeeinträchtigungen: r = .78; (3) Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire: r = .76. Es ergaben sich Zusammenhänge mit der Schmerzintensität (r = .23-.62), dem Beck-Depressionsinventar (r = .26-.52) und mit der der Depressionsskala CES-D (r = .55). Für die kriterienbezogene Validität sprechen auch Befunde an stationären Schmerzpatienten, denen auf Grundlage des Mainzer Stadienkonzeptes chronischer Schmerzen drei Chronifizierungsstadien zugeteilt wurden. Normen: Es liegen Prozentränge vor. Nach Dillmann, U., Nilges, P., Saile, H. & Gerbershagen, H. U. (2011). PDI. Pain Disability Index - deutsche Fassung [Verfahrensdokumentation und Fragebogen]. In Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID) (Hrsg.), Open Test Archive. Trier: ZPID. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4505 Bei dem Testverfahren handelt es sich um ein Forschungsinstrument, das der Forschung, Lehre und Praxis dient. Es wird vom Testarchiv online und kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt und ist urheberrechtlich geschützt, d. h. das Urheberrecht liegt weiterhin bei dem/den Autor/en. Rückmeldung über die Anwendung eines Verfahrens aus dem Testarchiv des Leibniz-Instituts für Psychologie (ZPID) muss an die Testautoren/-innen gemeldet werden.

KIORTH CPChild MS University Hospital Muenster (UKM)

- 11/17/21 - 1 form, 11 itemgroups, 159 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: General information, 1. Personal care/ Activities of daily living, 2. Positioning, Transferring & Mobility, 3. Comfort & Emotions, 4. Communication & Social Interaction, 5. Health, 6. Overall Quality of Life, 7. Importance of items to your child's quality of life, 8. Facts about your child, 9. Facts about you, CPChild result
Hospital Routine Documentation Form at the University Hospital Muenster. Original Form name: KIORTH CPChild MS. German description: CPChild Ein Index zur gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität bei Menschen mit Behinderung

QuickDASH

- 9/17/21 - 1 form, 2 itemgroups, 11 items, 11 languages
Itemgroups: Activities last week, Symptom severity last week
http://dash.iwh.on.ca/quickdash The QuickDASH is a shortened version (11 items) of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure. The DASH Outcome Measure was jointly developed by the Institute for Work & Health and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Copyright in QuickDASH: Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Free use of QuickDASH only in non-profit projects. QuickDASH may not under any circumstances, be changed in any way as even minor changes may alter performance. For detailed conditions of use see: http://dash.iwh.on.ca/conditions-use For informations about translations see: http://dash.iwh.on.ca/translations

Hannover Functional Questionnaire Backache (FFbH-R)

- 1/8/21 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 14 items, 1 language
Itemgroup: FFbH-R
Questionnaire for the diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache. German title: Funktionsfragebogen Hannover Rücken (FFbH-R) References: Raspe, H. H., Hagedorn, U., Kohlmann, T., & Mattussek, S. (1990). Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover (FFbH): Ein Instrument zur Funktionsdiagnostik bei polyartikulären Gelenkerkrankungen. In: J. Siegrist (Hrg.) Wohnortnahe Betreuung Rheumakranker. Ergebnisse sozialwissenschaftlicher Evaluation eines Modellversuchs (pp. 164-182). Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart. Raspe, H. H., & Kohlmann, T. (1991). Fortschritte in der Klinischen Diagnostik und Dokumentation des chronisch-rheumatischen Schmerzes. Der Schmerz, 5, S38-S51.

Neer Shoulder Score - Neer score

- 4/27/18 - 1 form, 7 itemgroups, 19 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Pain, Strength, Reaching, Stability, Range in motion, Anatomy, Total points
Score of the "American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons" (www.traumascores.de). An anatomically-sound classification method for proximal humeral fractures and an objective outcomes-based system for grading the success of therapy and recovery. Reference: Neer, C. S. (1970). Displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg, 52 (6): 1077 - 1089.

Constant Score

- 4/27/18 - 1 form, 5 itemgroups, 15 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Pain, Power, Activities of daily living, Range of motion, Total score
The Constant score is a method to describe shoulder function. It "is applicable irrespective of the details of the diagnostic or radiologic abnormalities caused by disease or injury. The method records individual parameters and provides an overall clinical functional assessment. It is accurately reproducible by different observers and is sufficiently sensitive to reveal even small changes in function. The method is easy to perform and requires a minimal amount of time for evaluation of large population groups." Reference: 4.Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Rel Res; 214:160-4. Derived from: www.traumascores.com with permission from Dr. Müller.

UCLA Shoulder rating scale - UCLA Shoulder rating scale

- 4/27/18 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 6 items, 1 language
Itemgroup: UCLA Shoulder rating scale
Score to evaluate shoulder function in five domains. Reference: Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Mar-Apr;(155):7-20. Derived from: www.traumascores.com with permission from Dr. Müller.

DASH-Questionnaire (UKM) - DASH-Fragebogen ORTH MS University Hospital Muenster (UKM)

- 11/7/17 - 1 form, 6 itemgroups, 44 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Abilities during last week, Symptoms during the last week, DASH Score, Sports and music module (optional), Work module (optional), DASH Score, optional modules
Hospital Routine Documentation Form at the University Hospital Muenster. Original Form name: DASH-Questionnaire. Copyright and Ownership: Institute for Work & Health (IWH), Toronto, ON Canada, Email: dash@iwh.on.ca. German description: Der DASH-Fragebogen - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Dieser Fragebogen beschäftigt sich sowohl mit Ihren Beschwerden als auch mit Ihren Fähigkeiten, bestimmte Tätigkeiten auszuführen. Bitte beantworten Sie alle Fragen gemäß Ihres Zustands in der vergangenen Woche, indem Sie einfach die entsprechende Zahl ankreuzen. Wenn Sie in der vergangenen Woche keine Gelegenheit gehabt haben, eine der unten aufgeführten Tätigkeiten durchzuführen, so wählen Sie die Antwort aus, die Ihrer Meinung nach am ehesten zutreffen würde. Es ist nicht entscheidend, mit welchem Arm oder welcher Hand Sie diese Tätigkeiten ausüben. Antworten Sie Ihrer Fähigkeit entsprechend, ungeachtet, wie Sie die Aufgaben durchführen konnten.

Functioning and Disability DSS Metadata Online Registry (METeOR)

- 8/3/16 - 1 form, 4 itemgroups, 13 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Activities and Participation cluster, Body functions cluster, Body structures cluster, Environmental factors cluster
Health sector data set specifications from METeOR, Australia's repository for national metadata standards, developed by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (http://meteor.aihw.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/345165) Functioning and Disability DSS The Functioning and Disability DSS aims to ensure national consistency in relation to defining and measuring human functioning and disability. This DSS has been developed to be consistent with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Functioning and disability are dual concepts in a broad framework. Functioning is the umbrella term for any or all of: body functions, body structures, activities and participation. Functioning is a multidimensional concept denoting the neutral aspects of the interaction between an individual (with a health condition) and that individual's environmental and personal factors. Disability is the umbrella term for any or all of: an impairment of body structure or function, a limitation in activities, or a restriction in participation. Disability is a multi-dimensional and complex concept and is conceived as a dynamic interaction between health conditions and environmental and personal factors (WHO 2001:6). A health condition may be a disease (acute or chronic), disorder, injury or trauma. Environmental factors make up the physical, social and attitudinal environment in which people live and conduct their lives. Personal factors relate to the individual, such as age, sex and Indigenous status. The components of functioning and disability are classified and defined in the ICF as body structures and body functions, activities and participation and environmental factors. Each component is composed of various domains; these are sets of related physiological functions, anatomical structures, actions, tasks, areas of life, and external influences. Qualifiers, the numeric measures coded after the relevant domain, are usually essential to the meaningful use of the classification because of the neutral terms of the domains. Many different 'definitions' of disability are used in Australia, both in administrative data collections and in Acts of Parliament. The consistent identification of disability in national data collections has been recommended in a number of reports, for instance to enable: • the monitoring of access to generic services by people with disability; • the collection of more consistent data on disability support and related services, including data on service use by different groups; • population data and service data to be related, thereby improving the nation's analytical capacity in relation to the need for and supply of services; and • improved understanding of the relationship between disability, health conditions and other health outcomes. Defining disability makes it possible to determine the number of people in the population with disability, those who are accessing services, both disability specific and generic, and those with a disability in the general population with unmet need. Better definition of disability will aid better targeting of resources to those in need. The concept 'Disability' can be operationalised in a wide variety of settings and for various purposes, using a combination of related metadata items as building blocks. The metadata items selected for a particular application may vary depending on the approach to functioning and disability. For example, in hospital rehabilitation, the focus may be on the impairment and activity dimensions, and in community-based care the focus may be primarily on participation. Some applications may require a broad scope for inclusion (e.g. discrimination legislation). Data collections relating to services will select combinations of the data elements, which best reflect the eligibility criteria for the service. The Functioning and Disability DSS comprises the following four clusters to describe level of human functioning: 1. Body functioning, qualified by extent of impairment 2. Body structure, qualified by extent, nature and location of impairment 3. Activities and participation, qualified by level of difficulty and need for assistance with undertaking activities and extent of and satisfaction with participation 4. Environmental factors, qualified by extent of influence of the environment Data collected using this DSS can be related to national data collections which use ICF concepts such as the Commonwealth State Territory Disability Agreement (CSTDA) NMDS collection and the ABS Survey of Ageing, Disability and Carers and, from 2006, the Census. © Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2015 Metadata and Classifications Unit Australian Institute of Health and Welfare GPO Box 570 Canberra ACT 2601

FOMT Neck disability index - Neck disability index Validierte Übersetzung

- 6/3/16 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 10 items, 1 language
Itemgroup: Patient interview
"FOMT"- Fortbildungen für orthopädische Medizin und Manuelle Therapie Neck Disability Index –validierte deutsche Version(Cramer 2014)

DWG-Register Oswestry disability index - Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index 2.1

- 6/2/16 - 1 form, 2 itemgroups, 25 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Demographic Information, Patient interview
Deutsche Wirbelsäulen Gesellschaft DWG-Register, http://www.dwg.org

DWG-Register Neck disability index - Neck disability index

- 6/2/16 - 1 form, 2 itemgroups, 24 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Demographic Information, Patient interview
Deutsche Wirbelsäulen Gesellschaft DWG-Register, http://www.dwg.org

Contact

Please use this form for feedback, questions and suggestions for improvements.

Fields marked with * are required.

Help

Do you need help on how to use the search function? Please watch the corresponding tutorial video for more details and learn how to use the search function most efficiently.

Watch Tutorial